OVERVIEW OF THE TONES OF SELF TRANSMISSION


And good day, dear ones, this is Dwahl Khul.  We are here to serve and aid you.  Now, as we begin, we wish for you understand that these particular topics are topics which ultimately define the energies which can incorporated into each and every being who is destined and we would say, intended, to become one of the world servers, one of the individuals who will be of great and profound significance in the whole process of the ascension of the earth.  What we're speaking about is a realization that each one of these tones is a tone of creation incorporated into the energetic field of all individuals and, yet, for those who are to be the world servers, they -- the incorporation is an incorporation of great and more significance.  What we're really speaking about here is realizing that there can and will be many ways in which these teachings have impact upon the individual. Often times, individuals will find themselves motivated to explore more completely in depth, all that will be presented to them.  Other times, individuals may find themselves reactive or rebellious towards those thought forms which are brought forward to them.  All of this is very positive.  If there feels to be any kind of impact, whether it is mental, emotional, physical or spiritual, then you can know that the information is really working within you in assisting you to come into that greater sense of balance which is required for all of the work that is going to unfold in the next several years.

            This particular year is a pivotal year in the preparation and acceleration of all individuals who are here to be world servers.  This particular year is the year in which the inner sense of balance must be created and held in order for the energy to build sufficiently to move and motivate the entirety of life itself on earth.  What we're speaking about is that each one of you who will participate in this process of teaching and in this process of coming to understand more deeply who and what they are is doing so, in order to shift a whole quality of energy that exists in all life.  And, as the quality of energy shifts, the one life which is the truth underlying the experience of all who are on the earth at this time will emerge.

            So, we wish for all of you to embark upon these teachings with a particular sense of sincerity.  It is not important to take a serious attitude and to perceive that you must understand every detail of what is presented through the mental body or the emotional body or even the physical or spiritual vehicles.  But, it is important that you approach these teachings with a sense of sincerity, a willingness to just somehow know that who and what you are will be guided in response to everything that is brought forward.  Trust in yourselves above all else.  For that which we bring to you is simply designed to stimulate you into your next most appropriate step and into your most profound state of being. Only you can acknowledge who and what you are and only you can understand the depth of the profoundness of who and what you are. Let yourselves be carried in the sincerity, and in so doing, trust that you will be joined and linked with many others who in their sincerity will create with you a profound network of light which will activate at many different levels that which needs to be activated, accelerating you and stimulating you into the whole process that must necessarily unfold before you.  Trust in that, dear ones, for it will be the most natural and organic result of that which is this particular understanding, this movement into the self and into the self that is transmitted, that becomes the transmission for who and what you are.

            We begin discussing each one of these tones.  If you will at first present the title, the considerations and the words which are significant.  Begin.

Tone 1:  Unification and the Path of Return

            The transmissions, the tones of conviction for the Associations of Light.  The first tone is Unification and the Path of Return. Incarnation, Origination, and Return are the points of the triangle, leading to unification.  I would appreciate insight in what it is that you wish us to understand and I have questions regarding them also.

 

            Yes, first of all, we wish to suggest that the Associations of Light are the individuals who will be participating in this teaching.  They will be creating a particular network of light which we're simply calling the Associations of Light which are inclusive of the ascended mastery and inclusive of all beings of light who are participating together in particular levels of energetic consciousness, not necessarily known in what you would normally call a mundane conscious level.  So, realize that many of the linkings and the associations have been made.  For each individual participating is like the hub of a sphere whose spokes of light necessarily create ultimately the Associations of Light which will be the pathway through which the earth ascends.

            When we speak about this first tone, the tone known as unification in the path of return, we're speaking about an understanding that there is, indeed, oneness -- one central core essential energy that we would simply call the light.  The light itself is living and through the process of incarnation, each individual emerges as a spark of light from the unified presence that you would call God presence and as that spark of light is a holographic representation of the whole, that spark of light that comes directly from God presence, is that which then is the incarnation.  That spark of light becomes incarnate, not just in the physical vehicle that an individual would choose but in the planet that the individual would choose to incarnate upon in the solar system, that the individual is experiencing as a larger construct for the nature of the experience in the universe that one determines is going to be the most effective and important universe for that particular level of incarnation, that experience.

            It is the motivation to experience that generates the spark of light which is filled with all of the information that comes from its original source or God presence.  Now, when we speak about origination, we're speaking about the point from which that spark of light emerges.  Now that spark of light passes through different dimensions, different opportunities to experience through different time-space constructs, through planetary fields, through all that can be imagined.  Often times, the conscious memory of an individual finds itself fascinated with a particular dimension; particular time-space construct; a particular planetary experience and the like.  That fascination then becomes identified as that individual's point of origination.  When an individual is looking for their sense of home, from a broader context, they would be looking for that experience of being unified in that one thought, that one God, if you will.  Yet, that does not feel as satisfying as find that point of origination, that place, of fascination with the process of being individuated, for that fascination is a necessary component to the entire process of incarnation.  And, it is in that fascination that one then generates that which will become the movement to the return.

            The return is a path, if you will, to the point of origination which is just a period or a point of fascination in the whole process of being the holographic representative, the spark of light, if you will, emerged from the wholeness, the unified presence of God.  In understanding the path of return, one understands that it is just one's fascination into one's separation and one's individuation that then keeps them in the incarnational cycle.  It is because of this fascination with a point from which one perceives that one might have begun, that one must necessarily return again and again.  When the fascination is complete, then the true sense of unification takes place.  This is true for all of the realms -- the plant, the animal, the mineral -- all of the life realms on earth and in other planetary cycles, other universes that, indeed, the return is the desire to understand and ultimately release the point of fascination with appears to be an origination, a place or point of birth of that individuated sense of self.  Do you understand? Are there questions about this?

 

            I have a question from the point of view of the collective -- of the entire human species.  From its genesis, as it is created as a living body of light information inherently unified at a primordial level, are we to view the path of return as simply remembering our original descent into matter from the one life, the one light?

 

            In one sense, that is true and yet we would say that the path of the return is not about remembering the sense of unification or the descent into the matter or the individuation from that place or point of reference known as the one life and the one God.  The path of return is a return to a different stopping place, if you will.  It is a return to that point of origination when one feels oneself to be separate.  Now, this goes for individuals as well as for species.  At the point when humanity, as a species, began to develop a sense of itself as being somehow cohesive yet an individuated unit separate from its original sense of being unified with God, with all life, the species of humanity became fascinated with that point, that origination, and from that fascination determined that it would be necessary to return.  It would be necessary to cyclically move through energetic domains that would ultimately describe the course of humanity.  Humanity can be viewed as just another individual operating on the path of the return, not really knowing that there exists memory of the original sense of unification with God presence because from our perspective that memory does not really exist.  Now, understand that when we're speaking about memory, we're necessarily speaking about experience that is held in some kind of understanding, primarily emotional.  From our perspectives, memory is just a mental body attempt to describe emotional experience that is contained as information in the emotional body and identified by the mental body with the tools that the mental body has to identify this emotional information.  Now, humanity as a species, has specific qualities of emotional information inherent in what you would call the collective emotional body.  The emotion is that sense of fear that is associated with separation, that is associated with this descent, if you will, this movement from the original source of God presence, the oneness, the unification.  The memory is just a construct.  It's like an imaginative way of attempting to describe self, attempting to describe life before what is perceived as the fear that came at the point of separation.  It is -- there is no experience that is held in memory for in that original sense of God presence, there is no emotion that would be held or clung to.  The first emotion, if you will, that comes at the point of incarnation, even for the species of humanity, is the emotion of fear.  That emotion is that which is then constantly dealt with through the mental body and through the memories that are attempted to be constructed.  Now, love is an all encompassing energy field.  It is not an emotion.  We are not saying that love is not present.  However, we are saying that love is not an emotion and that the first emotion that is dealt with by the species and by individuals is that of fear.  Do you understand?

           

            Yes.

 

            Does this make sense to you?

 

            Yes.

 

            Do you require more?  Have we covered all of the three points of the triangle?

 

            Yes.  The incarnation, origination and return are the three points of the triangle.

 

            Yes.  We perceive that we have covered them.  And the next tone or topic, please.

 

            Okay.  In line with what you were just speaking, hopefully we're not elaborating too much on this.  From your perspective is it entirely possible for the individual psyche to transcend the collective mind set within which that individual has incarnated?

 

            Absolutely.  The individual has complete autonomy to operate in his or her incarnation separate from the collective but we would say, not separate from the true unification which exists as the original sense of self, that isn't held in memory, that isn't held in the spiritual body or any of the ways in which you might perceive that it is held.  Unification is just that which necessarily exists as a quality of consciousness within all of the cells of the physical, emotional, spiritual and mental structuring, but it is not a memory, a thought, a feeling or anything like that.  It is something very separate.  So, transcending, we would say the collective, is really about the course of the human's incarnation and their process of consciousness evolution which is to transcend the original impact of the emotion of fear that occurred at the point of separation from true unification.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.

 

            Any other questions?

 

            And that one means to do that is to investigate every emotion rather to deny the emotion?

 

            Yes.  One means to do that is to investigate every emotion rather than to deny emotion and, in fact, we would say that in the course of one's human incarnations, one is motivated to experience all emotions, for experience primarily comes as a motivation to experience all emotions.  Do you understand?

 Tone 2: The Process of Evolution

            Yes.  Tone Two: The Process of Evolution -- the three points of the pyramid are mental, emotional and physical with the result being transformation?

           

            Yes.  Now, realize that this topic is the process of evolution, correct?

 

            Yes.

 

            As we look at the understanding of the process of evolution, we wish for you to realize that transformation takes place as the sense of the collective job descriptions, if you will, of the physical, mental and emotional body take place.  First of all, we would say that the mental body was designed to compare, to contrast like a binary computer, if you will, to provide information to simplify, organize and in some ways, understand the course of one's evolution.  The physical body was designed to be a vehicle to assist in the sensory experience of one's incarnation.  The emotional body was designed to gather the emotional experiences, the energies that are then utilized to assist in rounding out, if you will, to experience life itself. Now, these three bodies are linked to the spiritual body.  Yet, the spiritual body literally has no job description in terms of functioning in what we would call the mundane aspects of life. The mental, physical and emotional bodies operate in the dimension that we would call the mundane functioning of life and they operate as we have described them.  The mental, emotional and physical bodies all have higher vibrational modus operandi, higher ways of operating.  They all have a way of transforming into a much more profound job description.  As they transform, as these three bodies move into other dimensions of the way in which the life is experienced, that transformation is, indeed, the process of evolution.  Consciousness evolves as the bodies simply transform into their higher vibrational profiles.  As the mental body transforms into its higher mind, its higher mental faculties, it is no longer subject to comparing and contrasting. This is linked to the understanding of the removing of judgment from the whole process of consciousness evolution.  Judgment as it becomes evaluative and is it becomes separative and as it necessarily looks for more duality keeps the mind in its lower functioning capacity.  The mind, however, has a higher functioning capacity and that is simply what we would call the higher levels of understanding; the higher levels of realizing; the higher levels of operating in a very rarified form.

            The physical body is much the same.  It is a housing, it is an embodiment, it is a particular structure through which life itself is experienced, especially through the gateways known as the senses.  As the senses become rarified and move into their ultra frequencies as extra-sensory perception begins to become the norm, the physical body begins to function more effectively through the spaces that exist between the selves, rather than through the selves themselves being the experiential housing of consciousness.

            As the emotional body transforms, it transforms into a higher vibratory rate of experience that comes more directly through the spiritual body.  It just becomes the transducer, if you will, of information held in the spiritual body so that it can be accessed by the physical vehicle, operating in its higher vibratory field and so that the mental vehicle, the mental body operating in its highest mental capacity can understand and/or realize the nature of the experience that has been moved from the spiritual body into the emotional.

            So, as these bodies absolutely transform, evolution takes place.  These bodies transform both individually and through the collective and these bodies in their transformation are that which constitutes the entire process of evolution.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.

 

            Questions?

 

            Yes, I have a question about the interfacing the individual entity with the universe and my question -- it's a double question -- is the living universe in its wholeness, its totality in a non-evolving state of perfection or is it continually evolving its conception of being and becoming?

 

            Yes.  We would say that the living universe is in motion and in terms of understanding how you could describe that motion, evolution, which is a direct result of transformation, which is just another way of describing movement, is the natural result. Now, evolution in no way says that there is no present perfection.  In fact, perfection is a completely non-static --completely non-static state of being.  Perfection is a state of being that is constantly evolving as the course of evolution unfolds.  So the living universe is evolving and is simultaneously always in a constant state of perfection, not constant in terms of static but constant in terms of duration. Do you understand?

 

            Yes.

 

            Does that answer your question?

 

            Yes.

 

            Anything else?

 

            I do have another question about the individual evolution. As children of the living universe, do we evolve only as we as individuals transform inherited human tendencies or misconceptions about who they are as individuals or do -- is our evolution inherently mimicking, consciously or unconsciously, the process of our parent body?

 

            We would say, first of all, an individual evolves as a -- as a process of being part of that state of unification that we have spoken about.  In other words, an individual evolves simply because it is an individual that came originally from that state of unification, that oneness, that one God presence which is, if you wanted to call it the living universe, it is the living universe of evolving perfection.  And, yet, an individual also chooses to experience the process of evolution through the transforming of his or her bodies and through the transforming of the seeming limitations that the collective of humanity, the parentage, etc., might somehow have imparted to him or her.  So, what we're saying is that the choice to evolve as an individual is nothing other than a choice coming directly from the state of freedom, which is a natural gift of the human individuation. And, through the process of choosing to evolve, that human individuation will look at the energies of parentage, the genealogical imprints, the sociological imprints, the species imprints, if you will, and will in the state of transforming all of them, naturally evolve.  And yet, if a human individuation did nothing, so to speak, it would still be in the state of evolution that is a necessary component of the whole process of life itself in alignment with its unification.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes, thank you.  So the path to unification, going back to the original source, you never really return to the original source because on the journey, everyone's changed so when its all back and united, it's not the same so the whole source transforms?

 

            Yes.  Source is constantly evolving and always in a state of perfection and the path of the return is really to the point of origination where one becomes fascinated and at that place of fascination, we would say there's a sense return and, yet, there's never a return to an objective original state of unification.  That state of unification needs to be understood as a constant.  It's like if we could describe it in geometric terms, we would say that unification is the one point of life. As the one point of light expands into a line or some sense of linearity, at many different points on that line, there will be fascination and there will be movement to and from all of those different points and whenever there is a fascination, it immediately becomes a three-dimensional reality.  And, that three-dimensional reality is what is explored over and over again as the path of the return.  But, the original point from which that line emerged is now contained or instantly contained within that line so the exploration of the line can almost no longer find that point yet it is known to be the point from which that unified place from which the line itself came.  Does this make sense to you?

 

            Yes.  But the point is also changed from the mere existence of the line?

 

            Yes, exactly.  The point, in a sense, no longer exists and, in a sense, exists continually and yet in ever-changing, always evolving state of perfection.

 

            I guess that's why we need a lot of help rediscovering our point of origin.

 

            Well, what we're saying here is that there is really no point, if you will, in attempting to find the point of origin. All that you are going to find -- the moment that you begin actively seeking are the places of fascination.  The point of true unification is different than a point of origination. Origination is if you can understand it, one step from unification.  It's the place of fascination and that's all that the human individuation can expect to explore in its path of return.  The unification is more like a given constant that exists but not in memory, not in mental body functioning, not in emotional understanding or spiritual understanding or cellular structure of the physical body.  To perceive that one will experience unification is to not really grasp the sense of unification that is beyond experience.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  Thank you.

 

            Realize, of course, that there limitations in words, that what we speak about is definitely something that moves beyond words and explanations.  It is something that must simply be almost a given within self.  Do you understand?    Question?

 

            Should we go to the third topic?

 

            Yes, please.

Tone 3:  Evolution as Holarchy

          The title is Evolution as Holarchy and with the pyramid we have Transformation on one side, Evolution and Commitment on the other two sides, leading to holarchy.

 

            Yes.  "Evolution as Holarchy."  Now, realize that we have spoken about evolution as being that which emerges from transformation and that the process of evolution or the course of evolution is dependent upon the transformation, for the individual and for the collective we would say it is the transformation of the bodies and, yet, the transformation is --can only take place as a an understanding of commitment.

            Commitment is the free will investment in the course of evolution through the process -- commitment is the free will investment in the process of evolution through the course of transformation.  Now, through evolution is necessarily holarchy. Holarchy is an understanding of the holographic representation of unification in each individuation.  Previously, in the process of consciousness evolution, concepts were brought forward about hierarchy -- hierarchy being a way to organize one's whole structure of understanding one's reality; hierarchy as being a way to evaluate one's process of evolution; hierarchy being a way to somehow sense that transformation had taken place because with hierarchy, there is a definite qualification in which there is a state of being that is less than and a state of being that is more than.  There is an individual who has become more evolved as another individual has not.  There is a process that looks as if there was first that which was inappropriate moving into that which becomes more appropriate.  These are all necessary constructs that are associated with hierarchy.

            When we speak of evolution, we speak of holarchy in which each individual or each unit of individuation, if you will, necessarily becomes the individual that they are.  It is really nothing more than that.  It isn't a better individual or it isn't a more appropriate individual or a greater than individual.  It is truly just the individual becoming the individual.  In that process, the individual becomes the holographic true representation of unification in life itself.  As the individual becomes the holographic representation of unification, the individual or individuating unit can then be a part of the holarchy which is just a larger hologram, if you will.

            What we're speaking of as evolution, being holarchy, is that evolution can no longer be associated with some kind of linear form of progress.  Evolution can no longer be associated with just the sense of moving from one point to the next.  Evolution is the way in which each unit become wholly what it is and in so doing, creates together the holarchy or the larger unit.  There is organization in holarchy, yet it is not hierarchal.  There is structure in holarchy and yet the structure is that which is generated out of free will, out of freedom to express self, freedom to be the individual.  Holarchy is that which will replace ultimately the fascination with polarization and duality. Holarchy is an attempt to describe a kind of organization and structuring that is devoid of old, lower mental functionings of comparing and contrasting; that is devoid of old, lower physical functionings; that looks to be about sensory experience that is judged and old paradigms of lower emotional functionings that are judged and withheld and not allowed in the entirety of the experience.

            Even in our attempt to describe holarchy to you, you will find that we almost make it look as if holarchy is a more appropriate thing than hierarchy and yet the truth of being in holarchy goes beyond that.  It is a transcendence state from that which has previously been understood.  The words are inadequate to describe it and yet you will begin to sense it functioning effectively within your being just through the levels of knowing and realizing that take place within you.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  This triggers a question in me that it seems that hierarchy is a very convenient mental body concept to alleviate fear of the human potential to participate totally in a holographic universe and it's like a prime prerequisite for human evolution is to release fear so that they can, in an open-ended sense, relate directly through their own divine alignment with the light in the holographic state of unification.

 

            Yes, we would agree that you are understanding in a very high way what we are speaking of through that particular comment.

 

            So, do we have help in releasing fear that is imbedded so deeply into the human psyche?

 

            Well, it isn't really about releasing fear as we would say it is about becoming comfortable with it and no longer judging it to be the boogie man which must be released in order to operate in a more profound state of being.  It's really about realizing that fear is a particular form of information that is necessary, effective, useful and that the pictures associated with fear are what can be let go of so that there is no real disillusionment. You see, the disillusionment is in [end of tape A]...and we speak that the illusion is in the belief that unification is an experience and can be experienced and that fear is somehow standing in the way or the obstacle to that grand experience. Yet, from our perspective, fear is not the obstacle is just the piece of information that came at the point when there was separation.  Separation, from our perspective, is not be viewed as a wound to be healed.  It's to be viewed as the process, if you will, that was necessary in the creation of an individuated life.  In other words, it was an opportunity which was simply chosen and seized for what it is.  Do you understand?

            Yes.  It's really about acceptance, then, even --impartially accepting even the fear that we feel in ourselves about just the immensity of who we are in our wholeness, in our profound alignment with the universe.  It's accepting everything unconditionally.

 

            Yes, we would say that is correct.

 

            Thank you.

 

            And the next tone, please.

 

            Tone 4:  Personal Response Ability to the Planetary Holon

 

            Relationship to God.  Relationship to the Self.  The base of the pyramid is Personal Response Ability resulting in Evolution of Humanity.

 

            Yes.  Well, we've touched upon a bit of this but we're going to move in a different direction here.  Personal responsibility to the planetary holon.  Now, when we speak of the planetary holon, we're speaking of the holographic organization, if you will, the holarchy of the planet itself.  We're speaking of what you would call the light body of the planet and yet we wish for you to understand that the light body is incorporated into the physical planetary body, as well as the physical planetary body being incorporated into the light body.  So, there is a sense of personal responsibility to the planetary holon and it comes as the understanding that the course of separation, which we have spoken about, is needing to be understood and accepted unconditionally as an opportunity is the opportunity for relationship.  And, as a necessary component of relationship, we would say there comes responsibility.  The ability to respond to what is perceived as other is the course or nature of responsibility that is necessary, that is a natural and organic component of relationship.  The whole sense of separation is, indeed, the opportunity to relate.  That is why separation has occurred and one feels separate from one's planet.  In order to have a relationship with the planet, one feels separate from one's peer in order to have a relationship to that peer.  One feels separate to what one calls God in order to have a relationship with God.  It's not important to experience God or unification, as we have talked, it's important to relate to God or unification for in that relating and in that natural sense of responsibility there comes a reciprocity of feeling as if there is communication, as if there is the sense of transformation that is necessary for evolution of humanity to take place.

            The evolution of humanity is dependant upon each individual's personal ability to respond to the opportunity that relationship has provided them with.  In other words, to respond to God and self as the course of relationship.  So, what we're speaking about here and in which we can go into further detail is the understanding of personal responsibility.  What one is responsible to is ultimately nothing other than one's self and, yet, one cannot respond to self if self is not seen at in some form of separation.  So, in the process of assuming personal responsibility, one is necessarily creating separation and, as we have stated, this means that there is fear as a result.

            Once again, fear is just information yet fear exists and fear carries with it and creates often times around it, pictures that are very difficult to deal with.  One's personal responsibility to the planetary holon is to ultimately dismantle their own individual pictures that surround fear, that surround the process of evolution as just the organic result of transformation.  Does this make sense to you?

 

            Yes.

 

            Are there questions?

 

            What occurs to me is in -- it seems that creation then is a movement on the part of the one life, the one light, in order to have a relationship with itself.  Could this be an aspect of --and we as the creation recapitulate that original motive through our desire to relate, also.

 

            Yes.  We would say that it isn't the desire to relate that is underlying the creation of separation that affords the opportunity of relationship.  It's the motivation to experience. Desire is something that develops a bit further on, if you will, comes in as a result of the motivation to experience.

            First, one is motivated to experience and in so doing, is separate and in the fear that comes as the process of separation begins, that motivation to experience then generates desires, generates the other emotional constructs through which the rest of one's life, one's incarnation is then created.  And, in the process of creation, there is a necessary resultant relationship and, yet, we would say that it isn't the desire to create that brings about this opportunity.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  I have other question here in placing personal responsibility to the planetary holon in a more reverential context in asking how do you view individuals who refuse, consciously or unconsciously to serve the planetary holon?  Do their retrogressive tendencies retard the birthing process of our planetary holon into a more expanded awareness of universal integrity?  In other words, are the individuals who do not respond to the planetary holon, are they like elements of friction that accompanies all birthing processes?

 

            First of all, we would say those individuals are responding, that responsibility is not to be taken in an old hierarchal paradigm of understanding whereby there are certain things that are right and certain things that are wrong.  The individuals who maintain the balance, if you will, in their response looking as if their response is somehow negative or detrimental, are simply doing so to maintain the balance.  They are using their free will and their opportunity to respond in the way that is natural and organic primal for them.  And, responsibility has much more to do with taking an active role and participating in an active way rather than being -- rather than that active way having to have a certain seeming evaluative quality about it.  We would say that one who does not assume personal responsibility is one who simply refuses to relate.  That, in fact, those individuals who you would determine to refuse to relate would look more like individuals who are claiming themselves to be very realized and enlightened and somehow above it all rather than those who would look to be creating friction.  Do you understand what we mean here?  Does this make sense to you?

 

            Either modality would be part of -- this is used by the planetary holon for maintaining balance as it moves into its next phase of evolution?

 

            Yes, and what we're saying is that the responsibility, the ability to respond -- the responsiveness -- is to be understood as more of an active participation rather than an inactive participation.  And, active participation has no definition in terms of what is right or wrong.

 

 

            Everything is in the economy, the ecology of the planetary holon, absolutely every individual's action is used to refine and accelerate its inherent process?

 

            Yes, absolutely.

 

            Those individuals who choose to, say, be in a catatonic or vegetative state, they are still actively responding, although not physically, but emotionally and mentally on some level?

 

            Yes, we would agree.  And, while we would not want to get into a place here where we are attempting to evaluate individual responses, we would say that a lack of personal responsibility would look more like a refusal to act than acting in what you might call a negative or positive way.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.

 

            Does this complete this topic?

 

Tone 5: Profound Action in the World

 

            Yes.  The fifth topic is to do with profound action in the world - conviction - and the pyramidal view of that is feeling, thought and action.

 

            Yes.  And, so you understand here, with profound action in the world, helping to describe the tone of conviction, we're talking precisely about a form, if you will, that personal responsibility can take with feeling, thought and action being the components of it.

            First of all, we would say true conviction is a synthesis of feeling, thought and action.  In other words, without feeling, without thought, action itself has no value or meaning.  That, what you're looking for is a whole being ability to operate in the world with conviction.  To have the most profound action in the world one must be aware of one's feelings, thoughts and actions constantly.  Not an awareness in which you are constantly evaluating yourself, but in an awareness in which there is a definite sense of allowing all of the facets of self to be wholly and completely expressed in the actions that one takes.  These profound actions could also be called the actions of healing because from our perspective, healing is nothing other than a movement into a more profound state of being.  And, when actions are taken in a movement of a more profound state of being they are profound actions and they ultimately demonstrate the essence of conviction, which is a necessary component of all of the individual would-be servers.  And, all who would create together the Associations of Light there must be conviction, there must be a synthesis of feeling, thought and action.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  A question again arises for me in attempting to understand this more.  The whole figure of Hamlet arises in my --as I contemplate this -- the triangle of feeling, thought and action and how we can get lost in a complex, thereby paralyzing our ability to act the conviction and I'm wondering if we can actually be in this way, if we're not really awake.  It seems that there has to be a spiritual awakening from the complexities that froze Hamlet -- just the complexities of the collective mind set of just the mechanicality of response to the continuum of events.  Otherwise, how can we avoid our convictions manifesting as a true believer, a fanatic, whose way is the only way.

 

            First of all, we would say a fanatic is not an individual who's operating in conviction.  A fanatic is operating in fear. The elements of feeling, thought and action are imbalanced.  If feeling, thought and action are in balance, then the result will be conviction and profound action.  Yet, we would say that someone who is out of balance, who is attempting to act, what is really occurring within them as avoidance, if you will, of feeling, who is acting out of thought and attempting to make that look like conviction, then they're likely to appear as someone who reveals themselves as a messiah or a prophet or an individual who has all the answers, an authority, if you will.  Someone who would attempt to act in feeling and with avoidance or lack of real thought, would probably appear to be a fanatic, appear to be someone who is so emotionally engaged in their actions that, and without thought, that there is no real sense of conviction nor is it a profound action at all.  It's just action with feeling. And, from our perspective, it is the balance and the completeness of feeling, thought and action that allows for a real sense of conviction to be in place.  Conviction holds as its components the balance of feeling, thought and action.  Does this make sense to you?

 

            Yes.  Can profound action in the world -- does it necessarily have to be externalized?  Can it be a profound action that is through being one's truth?

 

            Yes, profound action does not have to be externalized, does not have to be internalized and, yet, we would say is internal and external both.  Because, the moment that it is profound action is the moment that it is having impact.  Profound action always has impact and whether that is through an externalization or an internalization or both it is definitely that which has impact.  There is no separation from our perspective in the externalized and internalized acts.  For that which is profound, is always manifest as impact in the world; in the collective; in the whole of humanity as well as, we would say, all of the other life forms on this planet and beyond.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  Another question arises for me in relation to this. Is profound action in the world only available to individuals who are soul embodied, hopefully not creating another goal orientation but is this a prerequisite for profound action in the world?

 

            We would say that, first of all, there are really no prerequisites, yet the greater likelihood is that those individuals who have soul merged, who have brought the soul into their physical vehicle, are going to find it more natural, if you will, to function in the world with conviction and will find that sense of balance more readily created within them.  So, we would say that individuals who are very soul merged are operating in profound action in the world as a very natural state.  Yet, all individuals and all life forms can operate in profound action. In fact, we would say that at this point, the mineral world, the animal world, and the plant world are all operating in conviction.  That, the feeling, thought and action part of their consciousness is in balance on the whole and therefore the action that is taken in the world is profound.  Do you understand?

 

            Yes.  Could you define the terminology soul merged?

 

            Defining soul merged is simply realizing that the soul that has never been separate from who and what you are is infused into the cellular structure of your vehicle.  Often times, soul merge comes as a kind of initiation and an initiation, once again from our perspective, is a process -- a long-term realization or identification, which can incorporate a ceremony or a significant moment of realization but more often than not is a long-term process of gathering the sense of realization.  So, soul merge is a particular part of the preparation for ascension.  It us part of the enlightening of the physical vehicle.  It is part of the movement from the fear that was defining pictures of separation to be negative or difficult.  Do you understand?

            Yes.  You've answered all of my questions.

 

            And then the next tone, please.

Tone 6: Individuation and Relationship

 

            Individuation and relationship.  The three triangle sides are I, You and Self as in super-essential light field with the result in balance.

 

            Yes.  Individuation and relationship.  Now, when we speak about individuation and relationship, we wish to bring into understanding another step, if you will, of the core or essence of the process of creating relationship or experiencing relationship as an opportunity that emerges out of separation.

            First of all, realize that in order to be individuated and in order to participate as a holographic representation of God presence or unification in a holarchy, there necessarily must be some definition of who and what the I is.  So, the I creates what we call a membrane of distinction.  It's just the thinnest of membranes that distinguishes it, the I, from the other.  That membrane of distinction lets there be a You that is different from the I, that is not inequal but is not the same either.  What links the I and the You together is the super-essential light field.  That which moves beyond and joins the essence of the illuminative quality, the light, that is the fire, if you will, that is what allows the spark from the unification or the God presence to emerge.  That fire, that quality of the light, which is a quality, is that which melts the membranes of distinction at the same time as it allows the membranes of distinction to allow an I and a You to have a relationship.  In other words, that membrane of distinction, that boundary, is necessary for there to be a relationship.  And, it is a super-essential light field that melts or lets that boundary be amorphous.  It is in the understanding of the Self and the understanding of the deep sense of the Self that the I and the You know the process of unification and create, then, the relationship, but, as a necessary component of separation, individuation comes forward. One has a motivation to experience and one can only experience that which is his motivated to experience through defining who that I is, through the definition that says that there is this I that will experience and that there is this I that will experience through the generation of relationship by the process of individuation.   Does this assist you in your understanding?

 

            I'd like assistance with this.  In my life experience there's always been a catch-22 in that as I perceive spiritual relationship it's only an ideal concept that can only manifest as I am a fully individuated being, someone where my membrane of distinction has really become more amorphous and more malleable. And yet, there's my ongoing inner voice experience that tells me that individuation can only unfold in the face of spiritual relationship.  So, there's a -- am I clear to you what the catch-22 is?